16th Spacecraft Charging Technology Conference
Space Weather Solutions LLC
The Spacecraft Charging Technology Conference (SCTC) is an international series focusing on the science and technology of electrical charging of spacecraft by the space environment. Contributions are sought on a broad range of technology and science topics concerning the interaction of spacecraft with the charged particle environment and environmental impacts on spacecraft.
More info: https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/sctc2022/
Tracks
▼ Charging and Arcing Mitigation Back to top
73. Passive Cathode Coatings and Devices for Spacecraft Charge Mitigation and Electrodynamic Tether Applications
Jonathan Rameau
34. Plasma Spacecraft Interaction Code (PSIC): Model validation of the twin-probe method using chamber measurements
Omar Leon, Walter Hoegy, Brian Gilchrist
These experiments were a beneficial first step to validating the twin-probe method, however there remained unanswered questions due to chamber effects, such as charge exchange ions and high background neutral pressures. Understandably, performing in-chamber and in-orbit experiments for all possible spacecraft and instrument configurations is infeasible and prohibitively expensive. To predict the spacecraft’s charging behavior, MATLAB software, called the Plasma Spacecraft Interaction Codes (PSIC), was developed. The PSIC perform ”back of the envelope” calculations to estimate spacecraft charging behavior and understand how Langmuir probe measurements are impacted by a variable spacecraft potential. Here we present the general results of the code and comparisons to chamber measurements that highlight good agreement between models and chamber measurements. Then we will discuss the effectiveness of the twin-probe method over a range of parameters such as area ratio and the input impedance of the high impedance probe. Finally, we will present additional applications that are feasible with a twin-probe system on a CubeSat sized platform, such as maintain a negative CubeSat potential to enhance ion energy analyzer performance.
[1] L. H. Brace, ""Langmuir probe measurements in the ionosphere,"" Measurement Techniques in Space Plasmas: Particles, pp. 23-25, 1998. [2] O. Leon, J. McTernan, J. A. Vaughn, T. A. Schneider, G. Miars, W. Hoegy, B. Gilchrist, ”The Twin-Probe Method: Improving Langmuir probe measurements on small spacecraft,” IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science. January, 2022. doi: 10.1109/TPS.2021.3137765.
42. New Space ESD-resistant smart-antistatic wires and cables insulations
Pierre-Yves MIKUŠ
This paper presents some of the latest results concerning the development of new range of anti-static wires and cables solutions with controlled volume resistivity in order to mitigate surface and internal electrostatic discharges (ESD). This activity was initiated and funded by ESA in the scope of ESA ITT AO/1-7877/14/NL/RA.
■ NEW ESD-RESISTANT ANTISTATIC WIRES INSULATIONS
□ Electrostatic Discharge issue in Space
Wires and cables used in space can be susceptible to initiating electrostatic discharges (ESD) under certain conditions. The origin of ESD events is mainly due to the presence of excellent electrical insulation layers and their ability to store and build-up electrostatic charges due to their intrinsic high resistivity.The incoming charged particles can build-up inside dielectrics to “break down” threshold levels leading to electrical arcs discharged into nearby sensitive circuits.
□ New ESD-resistant antistatic wires concept
A standard way to protect wires and cables and others ESD sensitive components is to cover them with conductive films, braids or coatings in order to absorb and evacuate most of incoming charged particles toward the mass of the satellite. The drawback of this solution is the increase in mass, cost and volume of the finished product, and reduced flexibility. The thickness of any additional conductive material also needs to be optimized in order to reduce the residual radiation flux enough to fully prevent any internal ESD (iESD) risks. The added conductive layer also has to be grounded which can further increase the mass, cost and complexity of the systems.
An innovative approach explored by Axon’ to reduce the ESD risk for wires and cables without these drawbacks is to fully replace all the highly insulating dielectrics with “leaky” materials in order to permit a fast enough evacuation of incoming charged particles to the nearest conductive layer. The main objective of this development, supported by ESA activity ITT AO/1-7877/14/NL/RA, was to explore this concept by formulating, processing and testing new wire and cable insulation materials able to dissipate through to the central conductor the electrostatic charges that build up in a space environment.
The main challenge was to formulate and process new materials with volume resistivities low enough to permit sufficient charge decay speed (for Space-ESD resistance), but at the same time maintaining sufficiently high values to guarantee the electrical insulation performance of the finished wires (acceptable insulation resistance and dielectric strength).
□ Development Results
New materials and AWG 24 coated antistatic wires prototypes with volume resistivities in the range of ≈1E+7 to 1E+15 ohm.cm have been successfully manufactured and characterized.
Electrical, mechanical and thermal tests have been performed based on ESCC3901 specifications, like spark test, voltage test, abrasion, cut-through, blocking, shrinkage, cold bend and thermal ageing.
Complementary tests have also been performed such as tensile properties, breakdown voltage, dielectric strength, and volume resistivity measurements as function of temperature and applied voltage.
15. The NASA Charging Handbook Update to NASA-HDBK-4002B
Wousik Kim, Allen J. Andersen, James Z. Chinn, Henry B. Garrett, Albert C. Whittlesey, and Kit Pui F. Wong
Design for control and mitigation of surface charging, the buildup of charge on the exterior surfaces of a spacecraft due to space plasmas, is treated in detail in NASA TP2361, Design Guidelines for Assessing and Controlling Spacecraft Charging Effects (September 1984). To address the growing concerns at the time associated with the in-flight buildup of charge on internal spacecraft components due to space plasmas with high energy electrons, NASA-HDBK-4002, Avoiding Problems Caused by Spacecraft On-Orbit Internal Charging Effects, was written by Henry Garrett and Albert Whittlesey in 1999 as a companion document to NASA TP2361. Although many of the ideas presented in NASA-HDBK-4002 had a long heritage, NASA-HDBK-4002 collected them in one convenient place and quantified and illustrated the design guidelines necessary to reduce the internal charging effects for the first time.
Since the original writing of the two documents, there had been developments in the understanding of spacecraft charging issues and mitigation solutions, as well as advanced technologies needing new mitigation solutions. That, and the desire to merge the two documents, was the motivation for the revision, NASA-HDBK-4002A, Mitigating In-space Charging Effects—a Guideline, written by Henry Garrett and Albert Whittlesey in 2011. This revision, the current NASA charging handbook (NASA-HDBK-4002A) contains details of the spacecraft design procedures for minimizing detrimental effects of spacecraft charging and for limiting the effects of the resulting electrostatic discharge. As such, it has served as the primary document for evaluating, testing, and mitigating surface and internal charging effects.
Since the last revision in 2011, however, there have been 4 major spacecraft charging conferences. The last 4 spacecraft charging technology conferences have addressed new levels of electron environments, new modeling methods, and many laboratory tests that are now widely accepted, which need to be incorporated in the charging handbook. The revised NASA charging handbook, NASA-HDBK-4002B, which is being published, will be presented. One thing to be noted is that 4002 and 4002A were expressly intended to be written to be guidelines rather than requirements. Unfortunately, many users merely copy various equations in the Handbook, which can lead to unfortunate results, because the mission and experiment needs can be vastly different for different projects. We clarify this situation for 4002B.
Koons, H. C., J. E. Majur, R. S. Selesnick, J. B. Blake, J. F. Fennell, J. L. Roeder, and P. C. Anderson, “The Impact of the Space Environment on Space Systems,” Proceedings of the 6th Spacecraft Charging Technology Conference, September, 2000.
40. Spacecraft charging related qualification of the Europa Clipper High Gain Antenna (HGA)
Justin Likar, Allen Andersen, David Knapp, Milena Graziano, Brian Zhu, Jaykob Maser, Meredith Nevius, Wousik Kim, Matthew Bray, Mike Noyes, Candace Davison, and Jason Feldman
The use of carbon fiber composites is ubiquitous within the modern spacecraft industry owing to its desirable mechanical, thermal, and RF properties. It is known, however, that these materials are susceptible to spacecraft charging and electrostatic discharges (ESD) as a result of non-conductive surface resins present in the carbon fiber composite layup. The Europa Clipper High Gain Antenna (HGA) represents a large (~3 m diameter) carbon fiber composite assembly present on the Clipper spacecraft. Multiple combinations of fiber and resin are present throughout the reflector, struts, and support systems. Owing to its large size and prominence within the Clipper Flight System (FS), discharges on / in the HGA could impact both FS RF communications and science payload operations – specifically the REASON (Radar for Europa Assessment and Sounding: Ocean to Near-surface) instrument. Severity of such impacts may range from “catastrophic” (e.g. overstress and permanent destruction of the victim electronics) to “nuisance” (e.g. noisy communications or degraded science observations). Regardless of severity ESD poses a threat not only to spacecraft systems but also meeting science / mission requirements.
In vacuo flood beam or similar test conditions are necessary to properly characterize the charging and IESD hazards as familiar, contacting, electrical measurements are overly influenced by the conductive carbon fibers. The effects of Radiation Induced Conductivity (RIC) on the charging and ESD hazard – specifically on discharge magnitude and rate – may be significant. Simultaneous inclusion of a second electron beam enables better matching of the predicted in-flight charge deposition rate, energy deposition rate, and ultimately less conservative and better representative results. In [1] we discussed the motivation for, and process of, multiple electron beam ground testing. Here we share complete results for all materials tested along with a detailed summary of the recently complete qualification effort of the BR127NC-ESD static dissipative primer used to mitigate charging / discharging on the reflector surface.
A series of tests and analyses were performed between 2020 and 2022 to assess the ESD threat resulting from Clipper spacecraft passage though the Jovian energetic particle regions. The results summarized herein focuses, primarily, on the ESD threat associated with electron charging at End Of Life (inclusion of both cryogenic temperatures and mission Total Ionizing Dose (TID)). This manuscript summarizes test details, methods, and results for a series (>10) of experiments performed by the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (JHU APL), the NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), and Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Center (ATC). We also summarize limitations associated with ground testing and extension of results to developing a fully qualified system for the Clipper mission.
References: Likar, J., et al. “Spacecraft Charging and IESD Characterization of Carbon Composite Materials with Multiple Electron Beams.” Presented at Applied Space Environments Conference (ASEC), 1-5 November 2021.
▼ Environments Back to top
127. Laboratory Simulations of Simultaneous Reduced Gravity and Ionizing Radiation Environments
Achal Duhoon
90. Statistical features of surface charging plasma environment in the medium earth orbit
Masao Nakamura
95. Effect of nonMaxwellian particle distributions to determine critical temperature on the spacecraft surface
Nazish Rubab
▼ Ground Testing Back to top
137. Experimental Study on the Space Electrostatic Discharge Effect and Single Event Effect of SRAM Devices for Satellites
Xuan Wang
16. Spacecraft Charging Test Considerations for Composite Materials
Allen Andersen
100. Development of internal and surface charge measuring apparatus for insulating materials using the pulsed electroacoustic method
Kaisei Enoki, Kazuki Endo, Hiroaki Miyake, Yasuhiro Tanaka
130. Characteristics of secondary electron emission on the polyimide degraded by electron of orbit condition with spacecraft operation period
Kosuke Amamizu, Kaisei Enoki, Kosuke Sato, Hiroaki Miyake, Yasuhiro Tanaka
Spacecraft are operated in an environment with drastic temperature changes. Therefore, it is necessary to maintain a constant temperature inside the spacecraft in order to operate the onboard equipment normally in such an environment, so the surface of the spacecraft is covered by dielectric materials called multi layer insulator (MLI). However, these materials are charged and degraded by high-energy charged particles, such as electron and proton ,degraded during operation. Hence, it is important to consider in achieve a long term operation that charging and discharging phenomena after surface material degraded . Generally, it is assumed that the molecular structure of polymer materials changes when they are irradiated with high-energy charged particles, and actually, it has been reported that molecular chains are scissored by electron beams. Therefore, in this study, we investigated the electron beam-induced secondary electron emission yield (SEEY) of polyimide, which was deteriorated by electron beam irradiation, to examine the changes in the physical properties of the material. As a result, there was a tendency for the SEEY to increase when the dose of degrading electron beam was changed. This research is carried out using the measurement system shown in Fig.1.
97. Charging test facilities at ONERA-CNES used for JUICE mission testing phase
Thierry Paulmier
5. Revisiting Design Rules for Floating Metal
J. Michael Bodeau
▼ Internal Charging Back to top
68. Simulated Charging of Teflon Tape in the GEO and Polar LEO Environments
Brian Beecken and William Johnston
70. Assessment of electrostatic discharge due to internal charging in materials deep inside spacecraft: Resistor-Capacitor model with discharge effects
Shinji Saito
In order to understand the internal charging and its threats, we developed a numerical model for the internal charging. The model is based on an equivalent circuit of a Resistor and a Capacitor (RC model) to evaluate the temporal variation of the charge accumulation in spacecraft dielectric materials. Electron flux with energies higher than 2 MeV obtained from GOES series in solar cycles 23 and 24 is applied to the RC model to evaluate the internal charging of the material deep inside the spacecraft. Based on the model calculation driven by the GOES data, we found that the charge accumulation tends to be faster during the decline phase of solar cycles, which is consistent with the report by Bodeau et al. (2010). Considering the threshold level of the electric field for the ESD, we incorporated the rapid charge-release effects due to the discharge in the RC model (RCD model). By using the RCD model, we evaluated the temporal variation of the discharge threat for 24 years, and found that the threat of the internal charging in the decline phase of solar cycle 24 was higher than that of solar cycle 23. In this presentation, we report the assessment of the ESD threat of the internal charging of material deep inside spacecraft by the RCD model, using long-term, in-situ data in geostationary orbit.
▼ Modeling Back to top
109. PICASSO Cubesat: Charging and Simulations of SLP Operations
Jean Porto
In this study we fully revisit the numerical model of the PICASSO spacecraft, assessing the effects of a refined geometric model including realistic probes sheath representation on the simulated instrument response and benefiting from the latest improvements of the SPIS solvers (SPIS6.1.0), to simulate Langmuir probe sweeps for October 26th, where a number of I-V curves observations are available.
Preliminary comparisons between the observed and simulated I-V curves, as well as interpretation of the observed signals will be provided.
[1] A. Waets, F. Cipriani and S. Ranvier, "LEO Charging of the PICASSO Cubesat and Simulation of the Langmuir Probes Operation," in IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 3689-3698, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1109/TPS.2019.2920136.
66. Geosynchronous surface charging assessment by collaboration of global magnetosphere MHD model and spacecraft charging model
Aoi Nakamizo
As the surface charging part of SECURES, we combine the MHD model and charging models, targeting the GEO region as the first step. Here we had two challenges. (1) The charging analysis tools require the densities and temperatures of ions and electrons (Ni, Ti, Ne, and Te) as the input. Because MHD models does not provide separately the electron and ion parameters, we developed an empirical method to estimate those from MHD data for GEO region. (2) The other problem is that the charging calculation takes a long time, therefore, even if the plasma data is provided in real-time, it is impossible to obtain satellite potentials in real-time. Thus, we have developed a quick estimation method.
Based on the above, we have developed a geosynchronous surface charging assessment system by using the realtime magnetosphere simulation data, and we have upgraded the system. We report the above mentioned fundamental researches and the upgraded system.
119. A Comparison of Modeling Approaches for Collecting Bodies on Small Spacecraft
Jason Powell
REFERENCES Mott-Smith, H. M. and I. Langmuir, “The Theory of Collectors in Gaseous Discharges”, (1926), Phys. Rev., 28, 4. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.28.727
75. Development of a fully kinetic particle simulation code for coupled plasma-dust transport
Jianxun Zhao
79. Beyond analytic inference inference techniques with a simulation and regression approach
Richard Marchand
117. Magnetic Field and Streaming Plasma Effects on Energy Harvesting from Spacecraft Charging
Sean Young
56. Propagated uncertainties in spacecraft surface charging
Justin Likar
We performed a series of parametric analyses using multiple surface charging tools (NASCAP2K and EMA3D CHARGE) and a simplified 6-sided cube model consisting of a metallic conductor and a single “variably semi-conductive” face. The purpose of these studies was to establish enveloping results for absolute charging (frame charging) and differential charging whilst accounting for uncertainty in inputs. Material property uncertainty included: Orders of magnitude variability in bulk (dark) conductivity and surface resistivity. Correlative variability in Secondary Electron Yield (SEY) properties (delta max and Emax) as shown in Fig. 1; delta max and Emax were varied together to produce credible, physical, SEY curves.Variability / uncertainty in Radiation Induced Conductivity (RIC) was not considered as it does not influence NASCAP2K results.
Also environmental variability: Worst case environments for Single and Double Maxwellians per ISO 19923. Correlative number densities and temperatures in Double Maxwellians as shown in Fig. 2.
Indeed we demonstrated that credible uncertainties or ranges in material properties produce results ranging from acceptable (e.g. little or no differential charging) to unacceptable with hundreds of volts observed. Results to be presented / discussed include: Sources, examples, and ranges of electrical property uncertainty in non-homogeneous and highly insulating materials. Materials such as static dissipative black kapton, Stamet, and carbon composites are ubiquitous in modern spacecraft designs yet their surface charging related electrical properties are not trivial to measure or model. Quantified resultant ranges in absolute (frame) potentials and differential potentials considering the variability in electrical properties (SEY and conductivities). Quantified ranges in absolute (frame) potentials and differential potentials considering the variability in Maxwellian environments. Round-Robin style comparisons between NASCAP2K and EMA3D CHARGE for these basic calculations.
Findings are presented along with initial applications to more complex spacecraft geometries – specifically Van Allen Probes (VAP). These results further illustrate the influence of material electrical properties on spacecraft surface charging. They illuminate the risk in over-reliance on under-informed analytical verification methods and the criticality in properly measured and modelled material properties. These results are of heightened importance when considering, for example, scientific spacecraft with rigorous instrument accommodations requirements, missions with docking and rendezvous operations, missions with electric propulsion systems, and / or carrying human beings.
▼ Plasma Propulsion and Tethers Back to top
118. Relationship between Electron Collection Current and Conductive Tether diameter
Masahiko Tetsuya
▼ Solar Array Interactions Back to top
25. Comprehensive Study of Vacuum Arcs on Solar Array Surfaces
Dale Ferguson, Boris Vayner
▼ Surface Charging Back to top
10. Graphical User Interface for Data Analysis and Execution NASCAP (GUIDE NASCAP)
Anju Damodaran
Graphical user interface for NASCAP execution using Python, which includes different modules of python viz PySimpleGUI, PyautoGUI and Matplotlib has been developed. GUIDE-NASCAP Interfaces input files e.g., Plasma environment definition, Run option file and Object definition file with the NASCAP software using a GUI. Sunlit-eclipse-sunlit execution are automated with the minimum user input. This software Optimized Execution time for the entire program. Automated execution of “wdraw” and “Termtalk” modules have been incorporated. The pictorial views of spacecraft potentials are obtained using NASCAP module, “OBJPOTL” through a click in GUI. Automated data analysis, image, plots and data table generation with minimum inputs from user are achieved and manual and repetitive steps in conventional method have been eliminated in GUIDE-NASCAP. Processing of data and analysis plots are available immediately. Faster execution and generation of Charging model with minimum user inputs are the prime features of GUIDE-NASCAP.
This paper details the features of GUIDE NASCAP and validation of Spacecraft charging data using conventional method and Guide Nascap method. The Figures for Automatically generated Object views for analysis, The Absolute Potential Plot generated through Conventional method of NASCAP execution and plotting in MATLAB and the Absolute Potential Plot generated through Guide- NASCAP are attached in Fig-1, 2 and 3 respectively.
Similarly, the Differential Potential Plots have been generated using Conventional method of NASCAP execution, plotting in MATLAB and using Guide NASCAP. The results have been compared and validated.
121. Spacecraft Floating Potential Measurements on Contaminated Sweeping Langmuir Probes
Rachel Conway
▼ 充電とアークの軽減 Back to top
91. Performance evaluation of MgF2 coated Electron Emitting Film for preventing spacecraft charging under vacuum ultraviolet environment
Daiki Hamada
Experimental method Prepare two ELF samples. A sample (PI sample) with a polyimide coating on a beryllium copper substrate with micro projections and a sample (FP sample) with a fluororesin coating. An experimental sample is prepared by applying a coating of MgF2 to them. Bias those substrates to -3kV and irradiate with UV light in a vacuum. Performance evaluation is performed by measuring the surface potential and field electron emission current.
Result The FP sample had a field emission of approximately 15 μA for 110 seconds 134 minutes after UV irradiation. No field emission occurred in the PI sample 360 minutes after UV irradiation. In addition, by measuring the surface potential of the sample, it was possible to observe the state of charge on the surface of the sample due to ultraviolet rays and the state of charge relaxation due to field electron emission.
Conclusion We were able to achieve a performance evaluation of the ELF sample when irradiated with ultraviolet rays. The FP sample was charged by ultraviolet irradiation and was able to emit electrons. In addition, it was also able to relieve the charge. This sample has about 40 times the electron emission current and about 2 times the electron emission time compared to the FP sample before applying the MgF2 coating. In addition, the PI sample did not emit electrons due to ultraviolet rays. The surface of the sample was charged. In the sample before applying the MgF2 coating, 2 μA electron emission occurred for 50 seconds. In the sample of this experiment, it is considered that the potential difference required for electron emission of the sample was increased by applying the MgF2 coating.



























